<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jesus, Look Who&#8217;s Representing Online Romance Peeps At RWA&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/</link>
	<description>The book crazy blogger who has an opinion on everything, from Britney Spears to the global economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet W</title>
		<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/comment-page-1/#comment-36058</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 21:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenknowsbest.com/?p=3705#comment-36058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s sad about horrid MB&#039;s LURV review site -- authors I know/like/respect -- when they show up there, it&#039;s hard for me to understand why. 

How do you filter that? Maybe their publishing houses are forcing them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s sad about horrid MB&#8217;s LURV review site &#8212; authors I know/like/respect &#8212; when they show up there, it&#8217;s hard for me to understand why. </p>
<p>How do you filter that? Maybe their publishing houses are forcing them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne C</title>
		<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/comment-page-1/#comment-35956</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenknowsbest.com/?p=3705#comment-35956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;An OT question here: is it just me, or does MB’s photo scare others? She’s definitely not a bad looking woman, just has the kind of eyes like from a painting in an old horror flick..the kind that follow you around the room even when the lights are off.&quot;

OMG- I thought I was the only one who thought that-..lolol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;An OT question here: is it just me, or does MB’s photo scare others? She’s definitely not a bad looking woman, just has the kind of eyes like from a painting in an old horror flick..the kind that follow you around the room even when the lights are off.&#8221;</p>
<p>OMG- I thought I was the only one who thought that-..lolol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AztecLady</title>
		<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/comment-page-1/#comment-35928</link>
		<dc:creator>AztecLady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenknowsbest.com/?p=3705#comment-35928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it interesting that the blog post Sybil linked to is 28 months old and yet MB continues to refer to her readers as &quot;viewers&quot;. It&#039;s a bit like that whole &quot;working &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;in&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; the internet&quot; &lt;em&gt;vs&lt;/em&gt; hanging online thing she said in her presentation at Princeton; as if she has this idea of how things work (or perhaps, how things should work) and she goes on blithely on the assumption that reality will conform to it sooner or later.

Either way, that&#039;s one workshop I&#039;ll be skipping :shrug: I&#039;m sure there are going to be plenty of interesting things going on at RWA that I can do.

(Like the panel on online marketing with Sarah Wendell and Ann Aguirre, among others, on Saturday :grin: jes&#039; sayin&#039;)


&lt;em&gt;[full disclosure: I beta read and do promo-type stuff for Ann]&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that the blog post Sybil linked to is 28 months old and yet MB continues to refer to her readers as &#8220;viewers&#8221;. It&#8217;s a bit like that whole &#8220;working <strong><em>in</em></strong> the internet&#8221; <em>vs</em> hanging online thing she said in her presentation at Princeton; as if she has this idea of how things work (or perhaps, how things should work) and she goes on blithely on the assumption that reality will conform to it sooner or later.</p>
<p>Either way, that&#8217;s one workshop I&#8217;ll be skipping :shrug: I&#8217;m sure there are going to be plenty of interesting things going on at RWA that I can do.</p>
<p>(Like the panel on online marketing with Sarah Wendell and Ann Aguirre, among others, on Saturday <img src='http://karenknowsbest.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' />  jes&#8217; sayin&#8217;)</p>
<p><em>[full disclosure: I beta read and do promo-type stuff for Ann]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuscan Capo</title>
		<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/comment-page-1/#comment-35927</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuscan Capo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenknowsbest.com/?p=3705#comment-35927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An OT question here: is it just me, or does MB&#039;s photo scare others? She&#039;s definitely not a bad looking woman, just has the kind of eyes like from a painting in an old horror flick..the kind that follow you around the room even when the lights are off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An OT question here: is it just me, or does MB&#8217;s photo scare others? She&#8217;s definitely not a bad looking woman, just has the kind of eyes like from a painting in an old horror flick..the kind that follow you around the room even when the lights are off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JulieLeto</title>
		<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/comment-page-1/#comment-35916</link>
		<dc:creator>JulieLeto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenknowsbest.com/?p=3705#comment-35916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m an author and I don&#039;t think all reviews should be positive.  I *wish* that all negative reviews were thoughtful and without mockery and condescension, but I also wish for world peace.  And I wish all positive reviews had pull quotes that an author CAN use for promotion, but again, that&#039;s sometimes like wishing for no-calorie chocolate fudge sundaes.  Best to just take what you can get, I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an author and I don&#8217;t think all reviews should be positive.  I *wish* that all negative reviews were thoughtful and without mockery and condescension, but I also wish for world peace.  And I wish all positive reviews had pull quotes that an author CAN use for promotion, but again, that&#8217;s sometimes like wishing for no-calorie chocolate fudge sundaes.  Best to just take what you can get, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mireya</title>
		<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/comment-page-1/#comment-35902</link>
		<dc:creator>Mireya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenknowsbest.com/?p=3705#comment-35902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Sarah T: Some authors do have that misperception (that reviews are supposed to be positive).  This goes hand in hand with reviews as a promo tool.  I&#039;ve had my share of arguments on the subject... and this considering that in the little publication I co-own we seek second opinions when we get a bad review on a book from a member of our team, plus we hold the policy of &quot;lessening the blow&quot; as much as possible *shrug*  I guess it doesn&#039;t matter how PC you are when posting a bad review, you are damned if you do and damned if you don&#039;t.  

On a side note, I see that this person is essentially of the opinion that reviews should cater to authors and not readers.  I guess that&#039;s partially why the RWA thinks she is an &quot;authority&quot; on the subject.  *snort*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sarah T: Some authors do have that misperception (that reviews are supposed to be positive).  This goes hand in hand with reviews as a promo tool.  I&#8217;ve had my share of arguments on the subject&#8230; and this considering that in the little publication I co-own we seek second opinions when we get a bad review on a book from a member of our team, plus we hold the policy of &#8220;lessening the blow&#8221; as much as possible *shrug*  I guess it doesn&#8217;t matter how PC you are when posting a bad review, you are damned if you do and damned if you don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>On a side note, I see that this person is essentially of the opinion that reviews should cater to authors and not readers.  I guess that&#8217;s partially why the RWA thinks she is an &#8220;authority&#8221; on the subject.  *snort*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/comment-page-1/#comment-35899</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenknowsbest.com/?p=3705#comment-35899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best statement about MB&#039;s relevancy is that she has not been mentioned in one press article about the Princeton conference. Sarah has been favorably mentioned in each of them but MB? It&#039;s like she didn&#039;t exist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best statement about MB&#8217;s relevancy is that she has not been mentioned in one press article about the Princeton conference. Sarah has been favorably mentioned in each of them but MB? It&#8217;s like she didn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katiebabs</title>
		<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/comment-page-1/#comment-35895</link>
		<dc:creator>katiebabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenknowsbest.com/?p=3705#comment-35895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RWA is going to be very, very interesting this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RWA is going to be very, very interesting this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahT</title>
		<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/comment-page-1/#comment-35892</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenknowsbest.com/?p=3705#comment-35892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RWA probably kiss her ass because she kisses theirs. 

I don&#039;t understand the attitude that all reviews of romance novels have to be positive. Does any other genre expect this? Doesn&#039;t it undermine romance authors&#039; attempts to be taken seriously?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RWA probably kiss her ass because she kisses theirs. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand the attitude that all reviews of romance novels have to be positive. Does any other genre expect this? Doesn&#8217;t it undermine romance authors&#8217; attempts to be taken seriously?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sybil</title>
		<link>http://karenknowsbest.com/2009/05/18/jesus-look-whos-representing-online-romance-peeps-at-rwa/comment-page-1/#comment-35890</link>
		<dc:creator>Sybil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 04:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karenknowsbest.com/?p=3705#comment-35890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2006/12/28/nasty-is-the-new-naughty/

She has such high respect for bloggers - yes?

Maybe she became a media expert with her &#039;viewers&#039; at lifetime.com it takes a great leader to lead people away but really the audience is authors she is always nice to them.  Rule is if you have something mean to say you wait til the person leaves the room.  You silly rabbit don&#039;t you know nothing about nothing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2006/12/28/nasty-is-the-new-naughty/" rel="nofollow">http://www.romancingtheblog.com/blog/2006/12/28/nasty-is-the-new-naughty/</a></p>
<p>She has such high respect for bloggers &#8211; yes?</p>
<p>Maybe she became a media expert with her &#8216;viewers&#8217; at lifetime.com it takes a great leader to lead people away but really the audience is authors she is always nice to them.  Rule is if you have something mean to say you wait til the person leaves the room.  You silly rabbit don&#8217;t you know nothing about nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
