HomeReviewsInterviewsStoreABlogsOn Writing

A Bravo’s Honor, by Christine Rimmer

a-bravos-honor

Part of the long running Bravo series, this is my second exposure to Ms Rimmer’s work. Just a few weeks ago I reviewed the previous title, The Bravo Bachelor, here. A western-flavored retelling of Romeo and Juliet (with the requisite romance genre happy ending), A Bravo’s Honor tells the story of Luke Bravo and Mercedes (Mercy) Cabrera.

He is the third son of Davis Bravo, the wealthy financier and patriarch of this particular branch of the large Bravo family. She is the adoptive daughter of Javier Cabrera. Both families have been sworn enemies for some sixty years, and while there haven’t been any duels recently, there seems to be plenty of bad blood-cause enough to avoid stirring the pot, so to speak.

Here is the back cover blurb:

Feuding Families. Secret Lovers?

Luke Bravo was stunned when Mercy Cabrera showed up in the middle of the night to treat his prize stud. The exotic girl he remembered had matured into a skilled vet-and a sultry, passionate woman he knew he should steer clear of at all costs.

Luke was a Bravo-reason enough to keep her distance. But Mercy had loved the rugged rancher since she was sixteen. And when their simmering attraction led to a night of intense passion, she knew she’d risk everything for a future together…

Bravo Family Ties – stronger than ever.

Where to start?

Even though both families live in San Antonio, a relatively large city, they take pains to avoid each other on those rare occasions when they find themselves attending the same social occasion. The younger generation is not uniformly convinced that a feud between the families makes any sort of sense (not the Middle Ages, after all) but comply with it out of consideration for their parents who, apparently, are rather set on maintaining the status quo.

When Luke and Mercedes come in contact as adults, though, they find it difficult to deny, let alone ignore, their mutual attraction. One would think that a few frank conversations between the different groups of adults involved, directly and indirectly, would clear things enough for these two to figure out whether anything permanent could come out of it.

Obviously, things are much more complicated than they appear-from long standing secrets to Mercedes’ sense of obligation towards her adoptive parents, to Luke’s reluctance to compromise his principles in order to accommodate her needs. Then there’s a bomb dropped in the middle of this minefield, and things get even more complicated.

Fair warning: I had issues with this novel that had little to do with the story (poor Ms Rimmer had the bad luck of my reading A Bravo’s Honor after a number of books with similar issues)

Putting that aside, there is plenty in this story that irks me.

Generally speaking, I don’t care for books in which a character has been “in love” with another character for years-even though they haven’t exchanged more than a hundred words during all that time. A Bravo’s Honor is not an exception to this quirk of mine.

In the universe I inhabit, a person cannot love another person if they don’t know him or her. Infatuation? Hell, yeah. Lust at first sight? Have seen it often. But love, the kind that lasts? Sorry, no can buy.***

Much worse when this infatuation starts in the early teens or so, yet the adult version of the character maintains that that childish feeling was “twu wuv”. Fairy tales much?

Then there’s the fact that, while telling us that neither of these two characters plays musical beds with strangers, they jump in bed together after a couple (very brief) interactions. It is not until after the sexxing that these two actually sit down and talk about the feud, their parents, what they want from any sort of potential relationship, etc. You know, the kind of things rational adults should probably discuss before jumping in bed?-particularly when there’s a history of bad blood between their families?

Now, of course, these kinds of conflicts are what makes a romance novel, right? It’s a bit contrived, as far as it goes, but it can work. In this case, it just didn’t work for me. I didn’t believe the supposed depth of the characters’ affection for each other based on what little time they had together.

Interestingly, it is not that I didn’t like the characters, I did, particularly Luke. It’s just that I could not suspend my disbelief long enough to enjoy their story.

With regret, A Bravo’s Honor gets 5 out of 10 from me.

You can buy Bravo’s Honor here.

*** I imagine there are plenty of people out there who are going to tell me that they married the person they fell in love with at first sight and that they have lived happily with him/her for decades thereafter. Fair enough-allow me to ask whether a) you married the moment you met him/her, and whether b) you didn’t discover countless things, between meeting and marrying, that you guys needed to compromise on and learn to work around. That process is what I consider “getting to know each other” and I reserve the right to believe that, without it, there’s no such thing as “love” for another person. YMMV, of course.

7 Comments »


  • Marianne McA
    June 25
    12:38 pm

    In the universe I inhabit, a person cannot love another person if they don’t know him or her. Infatuation? Hell, yeah. Lust at first sight? Have seen it often. But love, the kind that lasts? Sorry, no can buy.***

    That process is what I consider “getting to know each other” and I reserve the right to believe that, without it, there’s no such thing as “love” for another person. YMMV, of course.

    Book aside, this issue comes up from time to time.

    The argument I usually use is that while I didn’t (bad, bad mother) love my children when they were born – I had to get to know them first – I do know lots of men and women who will say that they were flooded with love the moment they first held their baby.

    And if you’re arguing that you cannot love a person that you don’t know, you have to say no-one loves their children in the first few weeks or months: that those parents are miscalling as ‘love’ something that we should properly term maternal or paternal infatuation.

    So in the end, it depends on your definition of love. If you call the instantaneous rush of hormones causing strong bonding between mother/father and child ‘love’ then I’d argue that you have to call an instantaneous rush of hormones causing strong bonding between grown-ups love also. Same physical process, surely.

    Just FYI, I think one way I think differently than other people about this is that I don’t believe that love = HEA. I’m not romantic about romantic love: I think it’s a physical state. And, having experienced it, I’d have to say that it’s a different state – a different sort of experience – than infatuation or lust.

    ReplyReply

  • The argument I usually use is that while I didn’t (bad, bad mother) love my children when they were born – I had to get to know them first

    And this is why I feel the way I feel (yes, exactly how it was with my kids)

    ReplyReply

  • Ah, well, AL. At least you’ve agreed to be my official consultant in the Spanish language from now on. From every not-so-good experience a little light can shine.

    And the whole “she had loved him since forever” thing was only on the back cover copy. I cringed when I read it, as well. I had more meant that she had been attracted to him forever. However, I’m sure I did introduce a note of “fated love” in the story, which is probably about the same thing, right?

    And yes, they hopped right into the sack at the first chance they got. I kind of like that. (!) But I grew up in the sixties when we did stuff like that. And I think I’ve had a sort of backlash from all the reluctant virgins I wrote at one time. But that’s another story, probably one better left unexplored.

    Anyway, hope you’ll give me another shot one of these days…

    ReplyReply

  • I imagine there are plenty of people out there who are going to tell me that they married the person they fell in love with at first sight and that they have lived happily with him/her for decades thereafter. Fair enough-allow me to ask whether a) you married the moment you met him/her, and whether b) you didn’t discover countless things, between meeting and marrying, that you guys needed to compromise on and learn to work around. That process is what I consider “getting to know each other” and I reserve the right to believe that, without it, there’s no such thing as “love” for another person. YMMV, of course.

    Yes, yes, and yes. My hub and I fell in love at first sight in sophomore year of college in ’85, knew right then and there we were going to get married and live HEA. BUT. For him, marriage meant kids and a house, and he wasn’t ready for that, so we waited until he was. 9 years. Lots of getting to know you time, and working out issues time. However, I do know people it worked for. My folks met on a blind date and were engaged 6 weeks later and married another 6 weeks after that. Happily married 45 years til my dad passed. Different time? Maybe. Sometimes it works. *shrugs*

    ReplyReply


  • Myra Willingham
    June 25
    2:43 pm

    I have to disagree about the love at first sight thing. My husband-to-be was a blind date and when he got out of the car and was walking up the sidewalk, my heart did a funny little jump. The blood started pounding in my ears. At the same moment I watched him break into a huge smile. The first words out of his mouth were: “Well, hello my future wife!”

    It does happen. Not to very many people, I admit, but it happened to Brady and me. We were married the following summer and have been for going on fifty years.

    ReplyReply

  • Aw, that is the cutest story, Myra!

    I like to read about love at first sight and/or heavy lusting from afar. Mmmm. And I’m excited to see a category romance with a Hispanic heroine! Hero too, right?

    Was the mistake a misused word in Spanish, or just some awkward codeswitching? The second is really hard to get right, IMO.

    ReplyReply

  • Ms Sorenson, the heroine and her family are Hispanic; the hero and his family are not.

    Ms Rimmer, thank you for being such a good sport–and as I said, it’ll be my pleasure to help.

    ReplyReply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment