Karen Knows Best

Seriously?

Did anyone else laugh at this?

No kidding.

6 Comments »

Lori
October 28
4:57 pm
Pot meet kettle.

Reply
AztecLady
October 28
5:27 pm
@Lori: I’m telling you!

I see the toxic egg going on and on about how ‘repeating defamation makes you liable’ and blah blah, yet the self-same eggs keeps implying that a federal judge–of all people–is going to be swayed on a case because he’s a Republican.

Dog preserve me from the willfully irrational.

Reply
Amarinda Jones
October 28
10:10 pm
I wonder if they actually thought about that before they putting it on the internet, allowing it to confirm what people thought of them? Still, god bless Pub Net for keeping us amused. I hope they use the Maxwell Smart standby of ‘a warped barrel is a fool’s frustration.’

Reply
AztecLady
October 28
10:12 pm
@Amarinda Jones: Screencaps are wonderful things, aren’t they?

Reply
Deirdre Saoirse Moen
October 30
12:51 pm
Who knew?

Even in the era of the Brashear case, EC/JJ (forget which) was borrowing money at preferential rates and re-lending it below market rates to TE/PM per the lawsuit. Part of the lawsuit was Brashear suing to get the just value of her 5%, and she wanted to make sure that those loans were backed out when the fair market value was determined.

Oh, and the irony, in one of EC’s filings in that case about why they’d fired Brashear, they quoted a snippy email to EC Biz because…

…wait for it…

…royalties were late and authors were checking their mailboxes every day.

She said something like: aren’t you doing that every day anyway?

Reply
AztecLady
October 30
12:56 pm
@Deirdre Saoirse Moen: I see that there are a number of followers and I am pretty sure many, if not most, of those are basically keeping track of the egregiousness of the Nut’s statements.

Though, to be sure, a strong stomach is needed at times. There’s only so much wrong one can take.

Reply