
Discrimination goes both ways
Monday, February 6, 2012Posted in: Azteclady Speaks, gay romance, Homophobia in America, Homophobia in Romance?, Homophobia is alive and well, RWA needs to get their PR sorted
Tags:RWA, same sex discrimination
Okay, so everyone (including me) is up on arms over the fucked up contest rules at Romance Writers Ink.
Over at the SmartBitches, dick is trying to convince someone that it’s not discrimination because people are entitled to their own discomfort. Which is another way of saying “let’s be tolerant of their intolerance,” from where I’m sitting.
Look, for me it’s like this: I don’t read f/f and read very, very little m/m for the same reason I don’t read horror or inspirationals: I don’t feel like it.
And given that I barely have money to buy what I do want to read, I don’t feel very charitable toward anyone who tells me that I should/must buy f/f to demonstrate that I’m not homophobic.
Sorry, but fuck that.
However, there’s rather a wide gap between that and “hey, this is a romance writing contest but GLBT people need not apply.” Why? Because in the past they have found judges more than happy to read and judge such stories with an open mind–open enough to have had GLBT winning stories.
So yeah, that’s bad–fucked up bad.
But there is a further problem, for me.
Several commenters are now blasting Oklahoma and all of its residents as homophobic assholes just because the apparent¹ majority of that RWA chapter made a GLBTphobic decision.
Sorry, guys–one attitude is just as fucked up as the other one.
(Furthermore, it’s a bit reminiscent of those lovely voices that keep chanting, constantly, that all “romance is trash, all romance is porn for women, all romance readers are all fat, delusional women, the romance genre is by its own nature inferior to all other literature” and the like. )
If you read Courtney Milan’s post, don’t skip the comments–at the very least, read this amazing one by Tessa Dare. Also, this Facebook post by Suzanne Brockmann.
* * * * *
¹ I would certainly love to see the numbers of membership, numbers of voting members, etc. for that particular decision.